Monday, 20 February 2012

Additional Comment to Amnesty at 50 (Years Old)

On [url: http://www.amnesty.org/en/50/timeline] Amn. Int. holds that: "Who we are"
"Amnesty International’s 3 million members believe that human rights abuses anywhere are the concern of people everywhere.
Until every person can enjoy all of their rights, our candle of hope will burn. It will burn until everyone can live in dignity; until every person’s voice can be heard; until no one is tortured or executed."
My opinion: This is my (ethical/legal) view too, except that I stand by the capital punishment (by anasthetics and guillotine, only or not) for the most detached and immoral idiots _taken_! Torture, as it says, is a fundamental problem whenever and every time it happens, whether this is a hidden fact from us or not! Every instance is a fundamental problem! Execution can also be interpreted this way: political prisoners are being executed on (usually, by commonsense and civilised laws) flawed grounds! That is, people are being executed beyond the usual foundations for legal grounding. This is a fundamental problem too, but far milder (at least by shooting/decapitation) than torture and is probably more self-harm in removing the good leaders for the future, I suspect. So in this instance too, execution is indeed an awful problem!
(The French may get offended by "anasthetics and guillotine, only or not", but they have perhaps lost innocence and virginity by now...?
The above by the (headless killings of the French revolution that took its own course back then... (Also: sorry for the painful emotions if any.))

It's fairly remarkable that Amnesty seem so forgiving to criminals _who would otherwise receive the death penalty_ when THEY KNOW about the status of the legal systems in Europe today and how difficult it all is, with various threats of REAL torture and blocked suicide routes only to ensure torture. Not only this, but they seem to count the disappearances/suicides/forged suicided/covered murders (in Europe) lightly well knowing of the grotesque facts we live under today, including the human meatshops of human flesh. So to what lengths can we continue to tolerate when Amn. Int. seem to reject torture so completely and blatantly?! When are they EVER going to take the full moral responsibility for those who are silently and in hidden TORTURED in Europe today? Let's not also forget the technological possibilities... (incl. piezo-RFIDs)!

Here I sit myself without _lawyer_ and without _a possibility to fair trial_ and possibly/likely 15 violations of 30 the my Human Rights by UN _only to make the case for state approved_ torture of myself AGAINST THE JUSTICE department of Norway, also including medical personnel... So why should I SHUT UP??? [You know, what happens when you turn to the Police like I've done lately for threats??? Yes, they send you straight to psychiatry for degradation and insults to your intelligence (probably ONLY on grounds of your personal moral standing, that you can _add_ to human progress and (moral) development!!!]

There should be NO doubt that I support the following, personally: harder punishment for crimes, epecially crimes of violence, and especially further crimes of dehabilitation, fx. losing an eye by a complete idiot, the death sentence, the capital punishment by the above, but possibly incl. "the whole row according to degree of menace and immorality" and far more guns in private ownership by revolvers, pistols and rifles, even assault rifles for selected "reserve corpse" individuals, "depending on country specific "intensity" and the need to protect and defend the country's corporate life/financial life"!!!

2 comments:

  1. Amnesty cites to have "won"/won the Nobel Peace Prize the following years: 2010, 2004, 2003, 2000, 1997, 1996, 1993, 1992, 1991, 1989, 1984, 1983, 1980, then, directly: 1977, 1975, 1974, 1971, 1968, finally: 1964!

    Note on membership: Membership reaches over 2 million, 1 Jan 2005! (It should perhaps become 10 or more, given good leadership, impact and organisational power and efficiency!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The whole thing above has first been written to Facebook! More exact time later.

    ReplyDelete