Citing: "Writing on Twitter, Mr Rasmussen said: "The suggestion that deployment of missiles in the areas neighbouring the alliance is an appropriate response ... is very disappointing.
"Nato's missile defence system [is] designed to defend against threats from outside Europe. Not designed to alter balance of deterrence."" This is almost as if NATO's Secr. Gen. fails to read "President Medvedev's warning follows an announcement by the United States on Tuesday that it would stop sharing information with Russia on non-nuclear military forces in Europe.
The information was being provided to Moscow under the CFE (Conventional forces in Europe) treaty."" How important this is? This is the classic build-up to an "invitation" to war!!! Why should _USA_ stop sharing this information? Christ!
Note: First posted by L.F.O.-L. at 11:22 CET. The header was Saturday, 26 November 2011!
4 comments:
I mean, in the case of Iran, Iran is really a sitting duck! It has NO way to avert a successful attack force by USA or NATO or whatever! I even doubt it, Iran, has occupying capacity! Well, well...
26 November 2011 11:25 CET.
Not only this, but what the heck is "Analysts say the US move is largely symbolic, although _the US state department said it was aimed at bringing Russia back to the table at negotiations._" Supposed to mean when everybody knows that NO negotiations mean peace! The negotiations ARE the business life and the Olympics by competition!
26 November 2011 11:27 CET.
The URL to the BBC story: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15857431 !
26 November 2011 11:28 CET.
Well, well, the "allegations" of the Iranian ballistic paths to USA may be right after all! Commonly, people forget to consider the roundness of the Earth and the fact that the Earth revolves. I think both these factors play in. In addition, as with ships, you need to accommodate the flight path of these things for various matters! Thus Poland and the Czech Republic? Yes, probably.
26 November 2011 11:53 CET.
No comments:
Post a Comment